Better Solicitors. Better Results

Call Us Free: 0800 999 6661

  • £1 million for injured worker whose case had been closed by a leading national firm and senior barrister Read More
  • £70,000 for local client who dislocated his shoulder following a fall at work Read More
  • £25,000 recovered for injured shopper Read More
  • £175,000 recovered for Injured Factory Operative Following an Accident at Work Read More
  • £800,000 for professional negligence losses Read More
  • £575,000 for serious eye injuries due to medical negligence Read More
  • £10,000 recovered for client who fell at local Bury retail park Read More
  • £6,000 recovered for a local client against Bury Council Read More
  • £15,000 for tyre fitter with vibration injuries Read More
  • £105,000 for injured worker rejected by 33 law firms Read More
  • £25,000 for injured shopper failed by national firm Irwin Mitchell Read More
  • £5.7m settlement for serious injury victim rejected by two national law firms Read More
  • £45,000 for dental negligence victim rejected by two previous firms Read More
  • £215,000 for business interruption losses (client advised by previous firm to accept £50,000) Read More
  • £1.5 million for road traffic accident victim with brain injury Read More
29th Oct

Mrs. B was employed by the Defendants as a care worker, tasked with providing care services to patients in the community. One of her patients was unable to bear weight and required assistance for tasks such as getting in and out of bed and repositioning.

To facilitate the patient’s movements, a hoist was necessary, and the assistance of two carers was required. Additionally, repositioning the patient safely on the bed necessitated the use of a slide sheet and the help of two carers.

About a month before her injury, Mrs. B noticed the absence of a slide sheet at the patient’s residence, which was essential for safely repositioning the patient on the bed. She reported this deficiency to her employer twice in the month preceding her accident.

Moreover, for several months prior to her accident, the hoist required for lifting the patient to and from bed had been malfunctioning. It was too stiff for Mrs. B and her colleague to operate effectively. Despite this, her employer advised proceeding without the hoist, which Mrs. B did.

A few weeks later, while at work in the patient’s home, Mrs. B and a colleague needed to reposition the patient on the bed. Without a slide sheet, they attempted to do so manually. During this process, Mrs. B experienced chest pain and sustained an injury.

Following the incident, Mrs. B contacted Aston Knight solicitors, and a legal claim was filed on the basis that her employer failed to provide her with a safe place of work, a safe system of work, a competent staff of men and adequate plant and material and subsequently brought proceedings to court. Her employers vehemently denied the claim. Further evidence was gathered and witness statements taken.

A careful and detailed review of her employers disclosure documents was undertaken. However, after evidence was gathered, a favourable settlement was reached for Mrs. B in the sum of £4,500.

Back to Recent Successes

Get Free Legal Advice

Aston knight difference

The Aston Knight Difference

Learn more

Road Traffic Accident

Learn more

Medical Negligence

Learn more

Serious Injury

Learn more

Injury at Work

Learn more

Dental Negligence

Learn more

Privacy Policy | Contact | Complaints Policy

Copyright 2025 Aston Knight Solicitors

Join the team
close slider

Join the team

Would you like to join the team at Aston Knight Solicitors? Work at one of the leading firms of solicitors in Bury, Manchester?  Then click below to find out more and what we currently have available.